O
Guilderland
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

Guilderland Residences PUD

Guilderland

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Opposed (3)Concerned (1)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
8
Last 30 days
4

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 6, 2026.

Public comments (8)

SupportiveRobyn GrayOct 6, 2026

Expressed support for the affordable housing project but raised concerns about public transportation availability along Route 20.

Town Board (Regular) - Oct 6, 2026 · 27:00 →
MixedKaren WhiteOct 6, 2026

Appreciated the developer lowering the roofline but suggested using muted, natural exterior colors to help the buildings blend into the surroundings.

Town Board (Regular) - Oct 6, 2026 · 29:09 →
OpposedRon BakerOct 6, 2026

Expressed concerns about the lack of tree barriers or fencing to provide privacy and block headlights for residents in the adjacent Windingbrook townhouse complex.

Town Board (Regular) - Oct 6, 2026 · 32:18 →
NeutralStephen ChesleyOct 6, 2026

Asked whether eligibility requirements or preferences would be given to current Guilderland residents and whether support services would be open to the public.

Town Board (Regular) - Oct 6, 2026 · 38:00 →
OpposedRobyn GrayAug 18, 2026

Expressed concern that the three-story PUD does not fit the surrounding neighborhood character, lacks sustainable green building practices, fails mixed-use requirements, and has an inadequate traffic study.

Town Board (Regular) - Aug 18, 2026 · 6:24 →
ConcernedLaurel BohlAug 18, 2026

Shared concerns about building height, clear-cutting five acres of trees impacting bat habitats, and lack of public use areas, while thanking the developer for discussing a tree buffer.

Town Board (Regular) - Aug 18, 2026 · 12:30 →
SupportiveKevin PruntyAug 18, 2026

Representing property owner First Columbia Western LLC, spoke in favor of the project and its benefits to the town.

Town Board (Regular) - Aug 18, 2026 · 50:30 →
OpposedLaurel BohlJul 21, 2026

Voiced strong opposition to granting a SEQR exemption for the Mercy Care Lane PUD, citing wetlands, wildlife, traffic, and lack of neighbor buffering.

Town Board (Regular) - Jul 21, 2026 · 1:09:28 →