O
Guilderland
← Community
HousingCommunity discussion

Pine Bush Parc Planned Unit Development

Guilderland

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (5)Concerned (4)

At a glance

Public comments
12
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Apr 22, 2026.

Public comments (12)

ConcernedLori McCaffreyApr 22, 2026

Questioned whether there is actual demand and capacity data justifying more apartments, and expressed concern that the proposed rents are too high to be truly affordable.

Planning Board - Apr 22, 2026 · 1:39:03 →
OpposedRobin GrayApr 22, 2026

Criticized the traffic study for relying on urban standards rather than suburban realities, and argued that traffic congestion on local roads is already severe.

Planning Board - Apr 22, 2026 · 1:48:45 →
OpposedLaura HammisApr 22, 2026

Highlighted severe safety and rear-end collision hazards on local roads without turning lanes, and criticized the reduction in workforce housing units.

Planning Board - Apr 22, 2026 · 1:48:51 →
OpposedCarissa BraunApr 22, 2026

Expressed concern over adding more rental apartments when housing is already expensive, and raised issues regarding school budgets, wildlife impact, and stormwater management.

Planning Board - Apr 22, 2026 · 1:50:46 →
OpposedSal GoldsteinApr 22, 2026

Pointed out discrepancies in the traffic engineering addendum regarding driveway counts and left-turn estimates, and called for a more thorough environmental review of endangered species.

Planning Board - Apr 22, 2026 · 1:55:34 →
ConcernedSteve MooreApr 22, 2026

Described heavy peak-hour cut-through traffic in residential neighborhoods attempting to avoid traffic lights, and questioned the accuracy of the traffic study.

Planning Board - Apr 22, 2026 · 2:09:10 →
ConcernedUnidentified ResidentApr 22, 2026

Argued that the town needs better holistic traffic tools like cell phone data tracking and comprehensive studies rather than relying on outdated submissions.

Planning Board - Apr 22, 2026 · 3:39:50 →
SupportiveGina LuceApr 22, 2026

Voiced support for the project, arguing that growth and new housing are necessary as part of a normal planning process and that developers work collaboratively with the town.

Planning Board - Apr 22, 2026 · 2:16:19 →
OpposedKathy MedbutzApr 22, 2026

Raised concerns about ravine erosion, snow storage, clear-cutting of trees, stormwater runoff, and the strain on local infrastructure and emergency services.

Planning Board - Apr 22, 2026 · 3:52:30 →
ConcernedUnidentified ResidentApr 22, 2026

Suggested holding a planning meeting at the Pine Bush Preserve center so board members can better understand the ecological importance of the area.

Planning Board - Apr 22, 2026 · 4:06:50 →
SupportiveValerieApr 22, 2026

Shared perspective as a long-time local business owner, noting that traffic is a normal part of community growth and that residents should work cooperatively on compromises.

Planning Board - Apr 22, 2026 · 2:34:44 →
SupportiveAnthony CarrowApr 22, 2026

Spoke as a real estate professional and long-time resident, explaining that development is inevitable, the rental market is strong, and the applicant has made significant concessions.

Planning Board - Apr 22, 2026 · 2:37:51 →