Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Supportive (1)Concerned (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 26, 2026.
Public comments (4)
ConcernedLynn JacksonAug 26, 2026
Expressed concern that the Pine Bush Commission might be interested in managing the set-aside land.
Planning Board - Aug 26, 2026 · 1:15:13 →SupportiveRussell GemmaAug 26, 2026
Suggested that the open space set-aside should be officially deeded to the town and Pine Bush Commission to connect with surrounding preserved ravines.
Planning Board - Aug 26, 2026 · 1:16:30 →ConcernedLynn JacksonJun 24, 2026
Expressed concern that the Polsinelli Estates project meets type one thresholds and urged the board to require an environmental impact statement, noting DEC informational wetlands on the site.
Planning Board - Jun 24, 2026 · 1:39:40 →ConcernedRussell GembaJun 24, 2026
Read excerpts from a Pine Bush technical committee letter arguing that the project triggers Type I thresholds and potential adverse impacts, warranting a positive SEQR declaration.
Planning Board - Jun 24, 2026 · 1:40:53 →