Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 12
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 28, 2026.
Public comments (12)
Expressed concern that the project has tripled in scope since zoning board reviews, relies on questionable gray-water plans, and creates mostly low-paying jobs not worthy of a $3 million public investment.
Industrial Development Agency - Jul 28, 2026 · 12:26 →Warned that the nearly $1.8 million property tax exemption will negatively impact school taxes and shift financial burdens onto local homeowners and renters.
Industrial Development Agency - Jul 28, 2026 · 19:58 →Criticized the lack of public transparency about IDA financing, questioned why the developer needs mortgage tax relief on a property already purchased, and noted local water and retail qualification concerns.
Industrial Development Agency - Jul 28, 2026 · 23:03 →Argued that subsidizing one local business picks winners and losers, potentially harming existing local wedding venues that received no public grants.
Industrial Development Agency - Jul 28, 2026 · 31:00 →Maintained that building 30 extra units and cabins on 14 steep, environmentally sensitive acres with a ravine and cemetery is completely unfeasible.
Industrial Development Agency - Jul 28, 2026 · 34:16 →Supported the project, stating that Altamont needs hospitality venues to bring in outside visitors and support local businesses without resorting to endless single-family housing sprawl.
Industrial Development Agency - Jul 28, 2026 · 38:20 →Raised concerns about intensive mountain development, low-wage jobs, water shortages, and the poor timing of the hearing which conflicted with zoning board meetings.
Industrial Development Agency - Jul 28, 2026 · 47:18 →Described finding tree clearing and burning near the ravine while investigating the cabin site, and asked if detailed site plans are available for public review.
Industrial Development Agency - Jul 28, 2026 · 52:00 →Suggested that if tax breaks are granted, a portion of the funds should be directed toward solving Altamont's long-term water infrastructure issues.
Industrial Development Agency - Jul 28, 2026 · 56:28 →Read comments on behalf of Deborah Barnes Breitenbach warning that leaving the building gutted while threatening inaction unless approved is coercive, and that 30 cabins will ruin wooded viewsheds.
Industrial Development Agency - Jul 28, 2026 · 57:44 →Compared the developer's stalled progress to past corporate tactics that leave towns holding the bag if projects fail.
Industrial Development Agency - Jul 28, 2026 · 1:10:40 →Questioned why a project expecting $1.35 million in net operating income in its first year requires public tax assistance from Guilderland residents.
Industrial Development Agency - Jul 28, 2026 · 1:14:00 →